Summary
of Experience
We have broad litigation
experience in federal and state courts, including related
appellate and administrative proceedings, arbitration
proceedings, and other forms of alternative dispute
resolution, in the following substantive areas: contract and business
tort; unfair competition; federal constitutional and
statutory claims, including litigation under 42 U.S.C. §
1983; defamation; lender liability actions; federal and
state environmental law, including claims under CERCLA and
its state-law counterparts; construction litigation,
employment termination and discrimination; bankruptcy
litigation; and class action litigation.
Representative Cases
Counsel to Rhode Island’s public
transit authority in federal class action under § 504 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973. The plaintiff class sought to
require the authority to limit its acquisition of new buses
to wheelchair-accessible vehicles. Such a requirement would
have increased acquisition costs substantially with no
evidence to suggest that wheelchair-confined persons would
increase their limited use of fixed-route buses. The
District Court granted the relief sought. On appeal, the
First Circuit reversed, holding that federal law did not
require the affirmative action inherent in the District
Court’s judgment.
Counsel to northeastern bank in
challenge to the prepayment-penalty provisions of the bank’s
loan agreement with multi-state manufacturing firm. The
trial court rejected the borrower's challenge. On appeal,
the Rhode Island Supreme Court affirmed. The case
established the legitimacy of bargained-for,
prepayment-penalty clauses in commercial loans governed by
Rhode Island law.
Counsel to Providence hospital in
connection with acquisition of adjacent municipal land and
buildings. Hospital intervened in an action
challenging the city’s right to sell the property. The trial
court sustained the sale to the hospital. On appeal, the
Rhode Island Supreme Court affirmed.
Counsel to a publicly traded drug
distributor in connection with effort, grounded in
anti-fraud provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, to forestall a tender offer by a management group. The
District Court issued an injunction against the offeror
permitting the company to entertain the offers of
third-party suitors. In the end, the shareholders approved
one such suitor and realized value greater than that
offered by the management group.
Counsel to partner in
Providence law firm in connection with effort by the United
States Trustee to hold partner in civil contempt for
participation as counsel in sale of real estate in alleged
violation of the automatic-stay provisions of the Bankruptcy
Code. Before trial, the contempt claim was dismissed
with prejudice pursuant to a settlement agreement.
Counsel to owner of thirty-acre
landfill in challenge to the Rhode Island Department of
Environmental Management’s (RIDEM) decision not to renew the
owner’s operating license. After lengthy administrative
hearings, RIDEM’s decision was affirmed. In an appeal to the
Rhode Island Superior Court, however, the administrative
decision was reversed on the ground that RIDEM exceeded its
regulatory authority. The Rhode Island Supreme Court
rejected RIDEM’s appeal, affirmed the decision of the Superior
Court, and reinstated the owner’s license.
Counsel to former owner of
hazardous waste site in connection with ongoing effort of
the
RIDEM to force the former
owner and other potentially responsible parties to
accept responsibility for response costs at the site in accordance
with the requirements of the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) and its state-law
counterpart.
Counsel to northeastern highway and
bridge contractor in ongoing defense of $4 million fraud and breach
of contract claims arising out of the sale of contractor’s
former plant and adjacent land.
Counsel to former Rhode Island
Secretary of State in litigation instituted
by Rhode Island’s Attorney General in an effort to prevent
casino-gambling referendum from appearing on the November
2004 statewide ballot.
Counsel to Chief Operating Officer
of Massachusetts-based, non-profit organization who had been
summarily suspended based on charges of sexual harassment
made by a female department head. After the case was
presented to the organization’s board of directors, the
board voted to reinstate the COO.
Counsel to marine contractor
in connection with claims arising from construction of
marina expansion and improvements at Block Island. The owner
declined to meet its contract obligations, contending that
several components of the work had not been performed in a
workmanlike manner. The case was tried before a single
arbitrator under the rules of the American Arbitration
Association. In the end, the arbitrator issued an initial
award decidedly in favor of the marine contractor as to the
merits of the controversy, followed by a supplemental award
requiring the owner to pay the contractor’s attorneys’ fees
and costs.
Counsel to major precast-concrete manufacturer in connection
with multi-count complaint of product purchaser alleging
manufacturing defects. The purchaser’s central contention
was that the products developed alkali-silica reaction as a
consequence of the concrete mix design selected by the
parties. A three-member panel of the American Arbitration
Association was selected to hear the case. After extensive
discovery and the exchange of experts’ reports, the case was
settled shortly prior to the start of evidentiary hearings. |